Try it Always

Try it Always

Rational Way to Happiness

Friday, April 17, 2009

Create Happiness


Create Happiness in One Step

There is one step to creating happiness. It is to express love. When you express the emotion of love you create happiness and joy within yourself. Happiness is not just a state of mind. Happiness is also a state of emotion.

It is easy to overlook our critical role of expressing emotion in creating our happiness. We are inclined to think of our emotions as a response to people and material things. One simple way this happens is that we hypnotize ourselves with words such as “He/She makes me happy.” Even the phrase, “I’m so happy you came to visit me.” can have an implied mental assumption that our emotions are because of them.

The part we didn’t see is that we expressed love for the person that came to see us. Where did that emotion of love come from? We created it. Emotions are invisible to our eyes and so we overlook where they are coming from. Yet the truth is that we create them ourselves. We can perceive other people’s emotions, but more than 95% of what we feel emotionally is from what we create.

The person that visited us is just a trigger for us to create and express love for them. We then experience joy from the love we express for people; not because of them. It is often easier for us to love some people more than others. This supports the false assumption that they make us happy. What it doesn’t take into account is how the beliefs and perceptions in our mind cause us to express love to some people and less than others.

Sunday, December 28, 2008

Rational Behavior Part 2

Worry: Sharks in the Swimming Pool

My life has been full of terrible misfortunes, most of which never happened.

MICHEL EYQUEM DE MONTAIGNE (1533-1592)

Chris was an ambitious computer consultant haunted by a peculiar anxiety—his fear that nuts and bolts, or other components of airplanes, would fall on his head, possibly killing him. If he heard the sound of an aircraft while walking outside, he would consider taking shelter. He felt anxious even if the plane were not directly overhead—for he speculated that falling objects might travel som

e lateral distance if they were thrown to the side by the airplane turning or by a powerful wind.

This is one of a long list of some of my clients’ far-fetched fears. Here are a few other examples:

· An elevator inspector was obsessed with the thought that he might suddenly decide to become a woman and have a sex-change operation—though he never had felt such a desire, and in his sexual preferences and behavior he was an entirely typical heterosexual male.

· A lawyer was afraid that she might inadvertently impregnate herself by touching microscopic deposits of semen on objects, such as a doorknob, and then accidentally touching herself while in the bathroom.

· A middle-aged, married accountant who had sent an angry but nonthreatening memo to a former boss, began to worry that the boss might sue her, causing her to lose her house and all her savings and become a bag lady.

· A timid lady, who would never hurt a fly, always avoided listening to news broadcasts and became panicky if she overheard part of such a broadcast, because she was afraid that she might hear of some atrocity such as a mass killing and be uncontrollably impelled to copy it.

· A young music teacher was afraid to go into a public swimming pool in a Midwestern city because there might be sharks there, which might eat him, or at the very least bite off one of his feet. An intelligent person, he readily admitted that sharks did not regularly inhabit swimming pools. He knew that it would be difficult to smuggle a live shark into such a pool; that if there were a shark there, he ought to be able to see it; and that any self-respecting shark would no doubt be so bothered by the chlorine it would not lie quietly in wait at the bottom of the pool. Nonetheless, he described himself as petrified by the thought that such a thing might happen, so that he had given up his twice-weekly swim. For my part, I conceded that I could not conclusively prove that he would never meet a shark in a swimming pool!

Such absurd fears are more common than many of us realize. There is, for instance, a cult magazine titled Shark Fear, and legends about sharks, piranhas, or alligators in the plumbing are rife from Florida to New York City. And although these fears may sound ridiculous to most people, that is no consolation to the individuals who suffer from them.

Here are some other fears which are widely held—I have encountered them all many times—and which cause real pain to millions of people. Consider whether they are any more reasonable than the preposterous fears mentioned above:

· The fear of being on a high floor of a tall building because one side of the building might abruptly crumble, or you might suddenly feel an irresistible urge to jump through the window.

· The fear that one will be possessed by an unconquerable urge to do something outrageous and embarrassing in public. For instance, someone sitting in the audience of a theater may suddenly be struck by the thought that he might get up from his seat, rush to the front, and jump onto the stage with the actors. He may then sit there in a cold sweat, not enjoying the play, because of his worry that he may at any moment uncontrollably do this outrageous thing that he does not in the least want to do.

· The fear that one will die while asleep. Someone may notice that his heartbeat slows down as he becomes drowsy, and he may then start worrying that it will stop altogether if he falls asleep.

· The fear of killing or mutilating someone close to you. Mothers sometimes experience a panicky fear that they will plunge a knife into their child, and husbands sometimes torment themselves with the fear that they will strangle their wives.

These commonplace anxieties are just as unreasonable as the more unusual ones mentioned earlier. We can easily see that they are all fears of something extremely unlikely. This gives a clue to the root of much unnecessary anxiety: a demand that one get an iron-clad, sure-fire, one-hundred-percent guarantee that something unpleasant absolutely will not occur.

With unlikely events, people are more influenced by a possibility that catches their imagination in some dramatic, spectacular way, rather than by the objective likelihood that it will occur. For instance, you often hear people argue against moving to California because they might die in an earthquake, whereas the death toll from cold weather—not to mention tornados and thunderstorms—east of the Rockies hugely exceeds fatalities from earthquakes in the West. Or some people will be nervous about flying because of the possibility of a fatal plane crash, but driving to the airport is objectively more dangerous.

Is This Blood That I See Before Me?

It was a blustery, overcast autumn day. At 11:55 A.M., Jerzy rushed out of his office and dashed to his regular restaurant. When he arrived, he was relieved to see that he had indeed got there ahead of the long line that formed every day around noon. He settled into his usual seat at a corner table, began to read his newspaper, and absentmindedly ordered his lunch. When the meal arrived, he picked up his fork—and froze.

Jerzy had spotted something amid the green of the broccoli and the orange of the yams—a tiny spot of crimson. “What if it’s blood?” he thought. “And what if it’s HIV-positive?” Jerzy was seized by the thought that he might get AIDS. He fled the restaurant, leaving his plate untouched, and wouldn’t go back.

In the weeks that followed, Jerzy spent much time worrying about the possibility that he might catch AIDS and began to lose sleep. He stopped eating out alone, and when eating out with close friends, he would ask them to inspect his food and reassure him that there was no blood on it.

It is, of course, millions of times more likely that you will die from food poisoning following a restaurant meal than that you will pick up AIDS that way. But Jerzy never gave a thought to that less sensational, more prosaic possibility.

A Dread of Uncertainty

To some extent, Jerzy’s anxiety resulted from his telling himself, “I MUST not get AIDS.” However, the main anxiety trigger consisted of his demand for certainty: “Since there is a one-in-a-billion chance that I could contract AIDS when dining out, the fates MUST guarantee me a zero-in-a-billion chance.”

Demanding certainty in an uncertain universe leads, paradoxically, to concluding that unlikely dangers are virtually guaranteed to happen. And if you insist on absolute, one-hundred-percent security, you create emotional insecurity for yourself.

For example, the fear of flying often stems from the idea: “I MUST have a guarantee, signed and sealed by the fates, that the plane won’t crash.” Consequently, once someone who fears flying agonizingly drags himself aboard the plane, whenever there’s the slightest turbulence, or the flight attendant frowns, the individual is convinced: “This is it! The plane’s going down!”

“Cowards die many times before their deaths,” says Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. More generally, it’s true that habitual worriers suffer a thousand times more agonies than they would if they stopped worrying about remote possibilities.

Jerzy’s Three Minute Exercise

So it was with Jerzy and his worry about AIDS. He demanded guaranteed immunity, and thus saw AIDS everywhere. We targeted his “need” for certainty in Three Minute Exercises such as this one:

A. (Activating event): I’m dining out and I see something red in my food. What if it’s AIDS-infected?

B. (Irrational Belief): Life MUST give me an ironclad guarantee that I will not get AIDS by eating this food.

C. (Emotional Consequences): Anxiety.

D. (Disputing): What is the evidence that life MUST give me an ironclad guarantee that I will not contract AIDS while eating out?

E. (Effective new thinking): It would be lovely if I could get guarantees in life, but none exists. Certainty is a figment of my imagination, and besides, I don’t HAVE TO be absolutely certain of anything. The probability is high that I will never contract AIDS. There are (probably) only probabilities, and I can live happily with them as long as I refuse to demand more. Oh yes, if there were any certainty (which there isn’t), it would be the certainty that as long as I insist on guarantees, I’m doomed to keep making myself anxious.

It’s a nuisance not knowing for sure that I won’t contract AIDS, but no evidence demonstrates that life MUST not give me such inconvenience. Life has much uncertainty. Too bad! It’s never the doubt itself, but rather my “awfulizing” about it, that worries me.

F. (new Feeling): Concern, rather than anxiety, about eating out.

Tony’s Worries

Tony, 25, was tall and thin with curly dark hair and an olive complexion. His problem was escalating, yet he joked wryly about it, giving me a variant of a standard witticism I have heard from dozens of clients: “After years of false starts and immature attempts,” he announced, with mock seriousness, “I’ve now completely mastered the art of worrying!”

Tony had spent six months in traditional therapy. “It helped me understand myself better, or so I naively supposed at the time. I tried to ignore the fact that the whole time I was getting worse.” He terminated therapy when it came to him one day that he could end up single-handedly putting his psychoanalyst’s kid through college. When Tony’s girlfriend landed a job with a prestigious law firm in San Francisco, they left New York. Now Tony felt it was again time to face his problem, so he returned to therapy.

Tony gave me a brief history of his worries:

“I can remember worrying about making errors when I was on the Little League baseball team. And then worrying when I was in high school, before a test and during a test—and, come to think of it, until I got my grade.

“I always thought that I worried more than almost everyone, worried about sillier things, and dealt with worrying worse than most people. I even worried about the fact that I was such a worrier.”

Tony was employed as a bank loan officer, a job he considered stressful. Every morning, the day ahead loomed like an ordeal about to unfold.

“When I start a new project at work, tackle a difficult problem, or when I have a ton of work to do, I worry. And I worry about learning new skills and about doing so poorly that I would lose my job. Overall, it gets more stressful as I move up the corporate ladder.

“There are times work isn’t so bad, like when I have something that’s not too challenging, or don’t have time pressure. But generally, my worrying leads me to dislike my job. Sometimes I’m up all night worrying, and then I’m tired the next day and waste time daydreaming at work. I have concentration difficulties. When I do sleep, I sleep poorly. I do badly at work because of my worrying.”

Job Security Worries

“The root of your problem, Tony,” I suggested, “doesn’t lie in your Little League experiences, nor in your promotions at work, nor in your shaky financial situation should you lose your job. Rather, it lies in your demanding ness—your ‘musts,’ your ‘have tos,’ your ‘got tos’ about your goals.”

I explained to Tony how “musty” thinking generates anxiety. I described the three types of demands: demands on oneself, demands on others, and demands on the universe.

“It’s clear to me what your major ‘musts’ are. Would you care to hazard a guess?”

“Let’s see, probably must number three: a demand on my situation—a demand on the universe. ‘Concentrating MUST not be so difficult,’ ‘Sleep SHOULD come easily,’ ‘My job MUST last forever’?”

“Exactly! And why MUST your job last forever?”

“Because if I lose my job, I’m royally screwed. I’ll never get such a good job. I’ve worked my way up. I’ll have to start all over again, at square one!”

Notice that Tony’s fear that he would lose his job was not a “silly fear” like the ones that started this chapter. Employees at all levels, even dependable, hardworking employees, do sometimes lose their jobs. But when asked why this was terrible, Tony responded in exaggerated, melodramatic terms about the consequences of losing his job.

“Let’s suppose that this is the case—although it’s unlikely—that you’d be starting at square one, even with your experience. We could certainly list fifteen or twenty disadvantages of your getting fired. But since everyone faces setbacks in life, why MUST you not?”

“When you put it that way, I admit that it wouldn’t be the end of the world if I lost my job. It would be unwelcome, but not a calamity. I suppose I’d better join the human race and face the sad fact that I could experience setbacks in my life, just like everyone else.”

To reinforce this, Tony and I made a list of the reasons why his belief that his job MUST last forever is false. Here’s what he wrote:

Reasons why “My job MUST last forever” is false:

1. If I lose my job, I lose it! Reality is reality, not the way I think it has “got to” be.

2. Although I keenly prefer not to lose my job, a preference does not equal a “got to.”

3. Although I would have extra financial and employment hassles if I lost my job, that’s all I would have—hassles, not horrors.

4. It could be nice to have a respite from work, which would provide a longed-for break to visit my brother in Italy.

5. I have savings I could live on for a while. I would be able to take my time and do a really excellent job of finding the best job available.

6. Losing my job could give me just the push that I have been lacking to take a chance on my dream—starting my own business as a computer consultant.

7. Losing my job would give me a golden opportunity to practice accepting misfortunes, rather than needlessly worrying about them.

8. I would see, concretely, that even the worst-case scenario is not as bad as I had anticipated.

9. If I lose my job, this would be a bad situation, but it would not make me a bad or worthless person.

10. I could be more money-conscious, for example, move into a smaller apartment, eat at home more, and buy a new car in five years rather than immediately. This would mean some deprivation, but I’ve survived deprivation before, and I will survive it in the future.

11. The simple fact of losing my job, by itself, can never disturb me. Only my bellyaching about it can do that.

12. Even if I never get a job as well-paying as my current one, I could accept that and still considerably enjoy life, although I could enjoy it even more with a better salary.

13. Losing my job would provide an opportunity to eventually get a position that may have certain advantages over this one: a more supportive boss, more friendly co-workers, less pressure, more interesting work, shorter commute times, less crowded work space, or better pay.

14. Pressuring myself not to get fired will not help me keep my job. Moreover, it could turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy: the more I demand this, the more stressed and distracted I get, and the worse I perform.

15. In the larger sense, all jobs are temporary. Career changes, unemployment, and lost jobs are part of life.

16. If I start at “square one” at a new job, I could work my way up the ladder as I’ve done before.

17. Everyone has significant discomforts, inconveniences, and hassles in life. This is part of the human condition. No reason exists why I have “got to” be exempt.

18. It could actually be a relief not to be so focused on getting promotions and moving up the corporate ladder.

Tony read this list into a tape recorder. He listened to the tape at home and in his car. He found this daily reinforcement surprisingly effective in eroding his “got tos” and thereby drastically reducing his anxiety.

Anxiety, Fear, and Worry

Fear and anxiety are basically the same emotion. We use these two words in subtly different ways. We are more likely to call the emotion “anxiety” if the thing feared seems vague or uncertain, but it’s the same animal.

Worry is the practice of anxiously pondering something, usually repeatedly and at length. So, if you feel a twinge of panic when called upon to make a speech, that’s anxiety, but not worry. If, on the other hand, you keep anxiously thinking about the speech you are scheduled to make next week, that’s both anxiety and worry.

Worry is anxious pondering; worry is a package made up of both pondering and anxiety. Or, in the form of an equation:

Worry = Pondering + Anxiety

Popular fallacies about worry mostly arise because people do not distinguish between pure pondering without anxiety, and pondering with added anxiety. People may say, “Don’t worry about that,” when what they really mean is, “Don’t concern yourself with that; don’t give it another thought.” This way of speaking is in itself harmless, of course, but mistakes arise when people believe that thinking hard about a problem has to be an anxious experience.

A chess grandmaster may spend hours pondering a position, trying to find the best move, but there is no reason why he need feel anxious about it, and he is more likely to analyze the position better if he is free of anxiety. The same applies to Proust writing a great novel or Beethoven writing one of his symphonies.

People will often say that worry is useless, and that it’s best to stop worrying, by which they usually mean, stop thinking about the problem. However, pondering some problem may not be useless—one may come up with an idea that would solve or alleviate it.

If you have an important interview tomorrow, you may worry about it, that is think anxiously about it. And this may do you some good in the interview—research shows that people do better on such occasions if they rehearse them in their minds beforehand. Yet the good that comes from such worrying comes despite the anxiety, not because of it. Merely thinking about the interview, without feeling anxious about it, will do just as much good and probably more. People who think anxiously about such things usually think far less efficiently than those who think non-anxiously.

Contrary to the usual view, it’s possible to feel keenly concerned about something without feeling in the least anxious about it. Ted and Timothy are great buddies and have a vigorous, friendly rivalry at table tennis, which gives them much enjoyment. They are each keenly determined to win, and excited and exhilarated whether they win or lose, though also distinctly disappointed if they lose. There is no anxiety in their concern to win. They don’t fear losing, though they decidedly prefer not to lose.

This kind of example refutes the popular but mistaken view that some anxiety is helpful because we need adrenaline to give us extra speed or concentration in moments of crisis. Extra adrenaline can be helpful in some situations, but we can have the extra adrenaline without any fear or anxiety, as Ted and Timothy do during table tennis, or as people often do during sex.

True, worriers do often spend a lot of time thinking uselessly about their problems, their thoughts going round and round in a repeating groove to no effect. But if they would learn to think about their problems without anxiety, they would then spontaneously stop thinking excessively about those problems where further thought was obviously pointless.

How can we learn to think about problems without anxiety? The anxiety—the fear—always comes from our demands, our “musts.” The way you can stop worrying and yet continue to think hard about a problem is to challenge and uproot your “musts.” When you find yourself worrying about some situation, it’s not the situation, by itself, that is generating your anxiety. It’s your “musts” that make you anxious, and tackling your “musts” is the best way to reduce your anxiety.

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Rational Behavior-Part 1

Ending Your Self-Inflicted Pain

What upsets people is not things themselves but their judgments about the things.

EPICTETUS (ca. A.D. 50-130)

Nearly everything in this book flows from a single, simple fact: the way you feel, emotionally, arises from the way you think. Your feelings come from your thinking. For most people, this truth is usually overlooked or denied. Here are

some typical statements from my clients:

· "I’m furious ’cause my eight-year-old didn’t get to bed last night until 1 A.M."

· "I’m awfully afraid Jim won’t show up for this appointment" (spoken by Jim’s wife while waiting for her husband in my office).

· "One impossible deadline after another. No wonder I’m so stressed out when I get home from work."

· "I’ve just discovered that my husband and my best friend have been carrying on for three weeks while lying to my face" (spoken by a wife, to explain her feelings of terrible injury and jealousy).

· "My husband never talks to me: I’m so depressed."

· "I was raised by two alcoholic parents. No wonder I’m an alcoholic."

All these statements suggest that when something happens to you, when some event occurs in your life, that happening or event is sufficient to explain how you feel about it.

What these people are really saying is that exposure to a keenly obnoxious, disagreeable Activating event (we’ll call this event "A") directly causes the emotional Consequence (call this "C"). These clients-along with most people-are expressing their view that there is a direct link between A and C, the unpleasant situation and their upset feeling.

Your Thoughts and Your Feelings

This is a very popular theory, but it’s a false theory. Events do not directly affect our psyches the way a needle in the arm causes pain (even then the pain has to go through our brain before we can feel it).

To get a glimpse of the correct theory, imagine that you are about to enter a room where someone awaits you. Your emotions will be related to your preconceptions, your thoughts or Beliefs (which we’ll refer to as "B").

If you expect a violent criminal, you may very well feel afraid. If instead you anticipate that it’s your young child who has been missing for days, you’re likely to feel greatly relieved and overjoyed.

However, your beliefs, expectations, and anticipations-your B’s-are things that you generate and control. And it’s B that creates C: beliefs create emotions. A or the Activating event alone does not create emotions.

Suppose a hundred airplane passengers are unexpectedly given parachutes and instructed to jump from the plane (A). If a physical situation alone could cause emotions-if A could directly cause C-then all the hundred people would feel the same way. But obviously those who regard skydiving positively (B) are going to have a C very different from the others.

The fact that feelings come from thinking was known to the ancient Greek Stoics and to many Buddhist teachers. It has more recently been rediscovered by Albert Ellis and other psychologists and has been tested in practice by thousands of therapists.

Unfortunately, there are still many therapists and counselors who are either unaware of this fact or who continually deny it. It’s not surprising that most ordinary people also deny it.

Your Childhood is Irrelevant to Your Present Problems

Everyone knows that individuals respond very differently to similar events. Jane dreads her upcoming examination so intensely that she can’t sleep the night before, and walks into the examination hall shaking with terror. Her friend Barbara, who’s taking the same test, remains quite unruffled.

Clearly, a person’s response to events is not entirely explained by the events themselves, but owes something to the person. However, instead of looking at that person’s conscious beliefs, for example Jane’s beliefs about the test, therapists often try to explain the person’s feelings and actions through their "unconscious" minds.

Sigmund Freud developed this way of explaining human behavior early in the twentieth century, a method popularized by many Hollywood movies from the 1930s on. Freud believed that our feelings and actions are caused by "unconscious" impulses-things that are in our minds but that we don’t know about. Our minds are filled with dark, disguised forces of which we’re normally quite unaware. How did these mysterious forces get there? They allegedly originated in our childhood experiences.

Jane’s fear of the test might be explained by incidents in her early childhood. Freud believed that the way to cure Jane is to uncover the buried memories of those incidents, have Jane relive those incidents, and show how they cause Jane’s present anxiety about tests.

This excavation of Jane’s "unconscious mind" can be a long and expensive process. The therapist encourages the patient to reconstruct some childhood incident, and to accept the therapist’s theory about how this is related to the patient’s current problems.

This approach to solving people’s problems has become very well-known, and many people expect therapists to be interested in the details of their childhood. But there’s actually not a scrap of solid evidence that memories of childhood agonies have much to do with a person’s continuing emotional difficulties, nor that uncovering those agonies will do anything to help the person now. Even where a person’s current problems really are related to a past unpleasant experience, it’s the person’s present thinking about that experience that does the damage, not the experience itself.

The theory that our feelings and behavior are governed by "unconscious" forces is not only unsubstantiated--it could be harmful. If people with problems believe this theory, they could become demoralized. The theory suggests to people with emotional problems that they are the puppets of dark forces they cannot control or even recognize. Instead of encouraging clients to feel that they are responsible for their problems and that they can do something about them right away, the theory suggests that the individual is helpless, even possessed. The individual is, in effect, encouraged to give up the struggle to be rational and effective.

"Shoulds" and "Musts"

Your feelings come from your thinking. This doesn’t mean that if you tell yourself everything is fine and you have no problems, then you will feel fine and your problems will disappear. The Three Minute Therapy method does not recommend "thinking positively," telling yourself to cheer up, or fondly dwelling on comfortable images that everything is wonderful.

The advice glibly offered to emotional sufferers-"Worrying doesn’t do any good, so why worry?"-is usually of little help because the anxious person doesn’t know how to stop worrying. Such a person has a definite system of beliefs, which has become a fixed dogma, and which automatically generates distress. Without attacking and changing that system of beliefs, there will probably be little progress in reducing anxiety. But the sufferer doesn’t think much about the system of beliefs, doesn’t consider that the beliefs might be questionable, and doesn’t notice how the beliefs lead to counterproductive and self-destructive behavior.

To start on the path to healthy thought patterns, it’s first necessary to identify the sufferer’s system of beliefs. This isn’t a lengthy process of excavating "unconscious" memories. Usually a few minutes of asking simple questions will elicit a person’s faulty thinking. If someone asks you whether you have a belief about the persistence of physical objects, you will probably be puzzled and hesitate to give a definite reply, or you may even reply in the negative. However, you don’t pay much attention to the possibility that the chair you are sitting on will suddenly vanish, causing you to painfully bruise your buttocks on the floor. In this sense, you do indeed subscribe to a belief in the persistence of physical objects, and this belief determines your behavior. In this case, of course, the belief is broadly true.

In the same way, the beliefs responsible for emotional problems are deeply-rooted, unconsidered assumptions. And these beliefs are false. Fortunately, when we wish to identify these beliefs, we start with an advantage. We already have a good idea, on the basis of the theories of Albert Ellis, and the experience of thousands of therapists employing his method, of the mistaken beliefs many people hold.

Such beliefs show a common pattern. They take the form of demands-"musts" or "shoulds." For instance, a person faced with a public speaking assignment may believe that he MUST not look foolish in public, and that to do so would be TERRIBLE. While it’s reasonable not to want to look foolish in public, it’s harmful to demand that this be guaranteed not to occur. Thus, the first step in curing public speaking anxiety is to accept, fully and without reservation, that nothing can possibly give you an iron-clad guarantee that you will not look foolish in public. You may possibly look foolish in public-to do so would be unfortunate, but not terrible.

The beliefs that give people emotional problems are evaluative beliefs. Virtually all emotion comes from evaluative thinking. Thus, if you just make a simple observation you will not feel emotion.

Let’s consider a statement such as "Jake admires me." That’s an assertion of fact only. By itself it does not spawn feelings. But if you add an evaluation, then you produce an emotion. For example: "I like Jake admiring me." "I love Jake admiring me." "I dislike Jake admiring me." "I loathe Jake admiring me."

The strength of any "like" exists on a scale from 0 percent to 99.9 percent. (You can never prefer something at the 100 percent level because no matter how strongly you desire it, theoretically you could always yearn for it even more.)

If you prefer to be admired by Jake only slightly (at the 10 percent level, say) you will feel mildly pleased that he’s admiring you and mildly displeased should he despise you. If, on the other hand, you prefer it at the 90 percent level, you will feel rather great when Jake admires you and greatly disappointed if he doesn’t. Thus preferences create emotions. Since the preferences are based on a scale from 0 percent to 99.9 percent, appropriate or reasonable emotions come from preferences.

On the other hand inappropriate or unreasonable emotions come from demands rather than preferences. What we call "demands" consist of magical, absolutistic, moralistic notions, and take the form of "musts" and "shoulds." For example: "Jake absolutely MUST admire me and it would be awful if he doesn’t!"

"Musts" and "shoulds" lead to dysfunctional emotions-emotions that eat away at you, such as anger, anxiety, depression, guilt, and self-pity. Demandingness also leads to self-defeating behaviors such as procrastination, violence, and addictions, including alcoholism, substance abuse, overeating, gambling, and compulsive shopping.

The key to the Three Minute Therapy method is that it’s perfectly rational and generally helpful to have preferences, especially quite strong preferences, but it’s irrational and harmful to turn these preferences into demands or "musts." The majority of emotional problems arise because individuals believe that something or other MUST be, or not be. For example: "I MUST do well at school" (instead of "I PREFER to do well at school"); "I MUST not feel anxious" (instead of "It’s UNFORTUNATE that I sometimes feel anxious"); or "My spouse MUST not behave coldly toward me" (instead of "I find it UNPLEASANT when my spouse behaves coldly toward me").

Allied with the judgment that something must (or must not) happen is the judgment that when it doesn’t (or does) happen, this is awful, terrible, horrible, shameful, or unbearable. In many different ways, we will show how these judgments lead to personal difficulties. Thinking in terms of "musts" is the essence of unrealistic, irrational thinking, as well as self-defeating behavior.

There are three kinds of "musts" or irrational demands. We will meet each one of these many times in the following chapters:

· "Must" #1, demands on oneself

· "Must" #2, demands on other people

· "Must" #3, demands on the situation (or on the Universe)

Many therapists try to persuade their clients to adopt only realistic goals and to give up unrealistic goals. But even unrealistic goals may be harmless, or perhaps beneficial, as long as they are viewed simply as preferences and not as demands.

Suppose you have an unrealistic goal, such as becoming the richest person alive. And you think, "I keenly PREFER to be the richest, and it’s unfortunate that I’m not." And you want that at the 90 percent level-very, very much.

Most therapies would say: "Holding that kind of unrealistic goal will cause you emotional problems. Think more realistically. Don’t compare yourself to others and just aim to do your best. Then you won’t feel so pressured." But such advice is wrong and could be harmful.

It’s wrong, because since you only have a preference, not a "must," you will not feel disturbed about not being the richest person alive. It could be harmful advice since high, lofty goals, no matter how unattainable-if viewed as preferences, not demands-motivate and add passion, challenge, and involvement to life. Great wonders have been accomplished by individuals striving for the impossible, and such striving doesn’t necessarily make those individuals unhappy.

In writing this book, our serious ambition was to have a national best-seller. Although the chances of this are small, such an unrealistic aspiration has helped keep us absorbed and engaged in our writing in a concerted, goal-directed way.

Disputing "Shoulds" and "Musts"

Merely pointing out to sufferers that their "musty," demanding thinking is responsible for their emotional problems will rarely dispel those problems, even if the sufferers agree. They will probably still fall into their old demanding thought patterns-unless they take a further step.

The most effective technique is for the sufferer to identify the specific "must" or irrational demand, which causes her problem, and then to actively dispute that "must." The person could write out an exercise each day in which the "musts" are listed and the reasons stated why they are groundless. Often, examination of a person’s habitual judgments reveals that they are unwarranted demands, and looking closely at these judgments is all that it takes for the sufferer to see this. But sometimes it’s necessary to argue persuasively with the sufferer.

This brings us to another distinctive feature of Three Minute Therapy. It involves arguing or debating. As a therapist, I debate with my clients, appealing to their reason to get them to look at their situation differently. Anyone using this book had better be prepared to debate with themselves. Many therapists refuse to argue or debate with clients, not recognizing that the client’s own intelligent mind can play an active role in the cure.

It’s important to dispute your "musts" actively. Anyone who has tried to grasp or memorize material in a hurry (such as a student before an exam), knows that merely reading through the material is not very effective. It’s better to be actively engaged, for example by writing out the material. Then it’s more likely to sink in.

Three Minute Exercises

Throughout these words we will be giving Three Minute Exercises which follow an ABCDEF format. Let’s see how these exercises work. Suppose you feel angry that Jake doesn’t admire you:

· A. (Activating event): Jake doesn’t admire me.

· B. (Irrational Belief): Jake MUST admire me.

· C. (Emotional Consequences): Anger.

As we have seen, it’s the "must" that’s making you angry, not just the lack of Jake’s admiration. If instead of a "must" you had a preference, you would feel sensibly sorry and displeased, not foolishly angry and infuriated. Thus the question becomes: "How do you eliminate the ‘must’ and thereby eradicate your anger?"

Answer: Proceed to "D." We set up a hypothesis, then look at the evidence for and against that hypothesis. By using the scientific method, we’re merely employing a more systematic form of the commonsense method of trial and error. We do this as young children, who are always making guesses about the world-forming hypotheses-then modifying or abandoning these guesses as they get more information.

"D" consists of Disputing or questioning your "must," and involves asking "Why?" or "What’s the evidence for my MUST?" Or in our example, "Why MUST Jake admire me?"

The correct response often comes as a surprise. There’s no evidence for this MUST, or for any MUST. No reason exists that Jake MUST do other than he does, however desirable I might find it if he did. So now you have moved to:

· E. (Effective new thinking): I prefer that Jake admire me, but I can survive quite well if he doesn’t.

It’s true that you find it unpleasant that Jake doesn’t admire you, that you would like it better if he did admire you, and perhaps even that it’s wrong of him not to admire you. But the universe is not so constructed that people always do what’s right or what other people would prefer them to do. Therefore it’s unrealistic to expect that this be bound to occur, and unreasonable to demand that it MUST occur.

Furthermore, when people demand that something MUST occur, they tend to think that something terrible happens when it doesn’t occur, that this is intolerable or the end of the universe. They express this with words like "awful," "horrible," "appalling," or "dreadful." But the plain truth is that, although you don’t like that Jake doesn’t admire you, you can survive quite well without Jake’s admiring you.

Having replaced your "B" (your irrational demand that Jake MUST admire you) with "E" (your reasonable preference that Jake admire you) you will then begin to experience:

· F. (new Feeling): regret or disappointment, but no anger.

Practice, Repetition, Reinforcement

A common way to begin learning to swim is to first rehearse the correct strokes on land. That’s a useful useful preparation, but you will never become a competent swimmer by that method alone; you’ll just thrash about awkwardly in the water. When the correct habits have become ingrained, after much practice on land and in the water, then you can call yourself a swimmer.

It’s the same when learning a language-Italian, for instance. At first you speak Italian mechanically and haltingly. You don’t expect to speak fluent Italian after one lesson. You keep practicing and increasing your skill-programming your brain and body with the correct habits. After you become thoroughly familiar with Italian, you feel it and live it. Italian becomes "second nature" to you.

The stages you go through in order to think straight and feel good are comparable to the stages of learning swimming or Italian. At first you make an effort to perceive that your "musts" are irrational, illogical, and self-defeating. Later you will deeply believe and feel this to be true.

The way to improve is simple and clear-cut but not easy: practice, practice, practice. Continuous and meaningful practice is required. More is better.

As with swimming or Italian, once you’ve acquired the skill and really feel it and believe it, you’re not finished with the discipline. You’re sure to get rusty and experience setbacks if you don’t continue your reinforcement.

Compare this with brushing your teeth. Suppose you brush and floss your teeth conscientiously twice a day for a year and then visit the dentist and she exclaims: "No cavities!"

Do you abandon brushing your teeth? Clearly not. You know full well that if you do, the plaque and bacteria will slowly creep back in and start their dirty work. That’s because humans naturally and effortlessly manufacture plaque and bacteria as a never-ending process.

It’s the same with your "musts." As a human, you’re a "must"- and "should"-creating animal. You find it easy to take those preferences that rate as important to you and make "musts" out of them. It’s in your genes as well as in your upbringing. You don’t have to be taught either to build plaque or to invent "musts." True, you can make the plaque build-up worse by eating junk food, and you can make the "must" build-up worse by practicing and reinforcing your "musty" thoughts. On the other hand, you can halt and reverse the build-up of plaque or "musts" by brushing and flossing, or disputing and questioning, regularly.

Similarly, your facility in speaking English would start deteriorating should you move to Italy and speak Italian exclusively. Even with your native tongue, a lack of practice will make you rusty. If you don’t wish to get rusty, keep practicing.

If you just read this book through and nod your head in agreement, you may find it entertaining, and it will probably give you some slight help. But that is not applying the method of Three Minute Therapy. The big returns will come only from applying the exercises to your own problems, such as writing out the exercises, and perhaps then reading them into a tape-recorder and playing the tape back frequently.

When you learn the basics of Three Minute Therapy, it may not immediately translate into feeling and acting significantly better. But as you conscientiously practice, you’ll progress to a higher level of skill and the rewards will come. Three Minute Therapy will then become a tool for you to quickly think yourself out of emotional pain and turmoil.

People often come to therapy believing that they can be finally and permanently "cured," with no further work required on their part. For most, this is not realistic. People are naturally inclined to irrational, demanding thinking, and it’s advisable to combat this inclination by performing the exercises indefinitely, just as it is advisable to keep on brushing your teeth. Once the basic understanding has been gained, future analysis and correction of faulty thinking will usually require no more than three minutes as the occasion arises.(be continued ...)

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Part 11

Importance. Important behavior focuses on important investments. Life is a business, and profit is its goal. Profit based on narrow definitions supports narrow decisions. If only in terms of money, profit is limited. Concrete measures make abstract benefits seem less important—not so. Personal, emotional, physical, mental, moral, and spiritual gains matter most, broadening all definitions. Prioritize human capital.

Individual cause

Universal effect

Important Behavior

Capital Investment
Need for product or service.

Liabilities
Secure means.

Connect
Connect with means.

Material Costs
Choose product or service.

Executive Expense
Choose methods.

Choose
Choose product and methods.

Organization Expense
Find the objective.

Sales Expense
Secure value for product.

Discover
Discover valuable objectives.

Assets
Perceive resources.

Collection
Perceive, collect, and record.

Perceive
Perceive the conditions.

Research Expense
Define important knowledge.

Distribution Costs
Define delivery channels.

Define
Define procedures.

Marketing Expense
Decide requirements.

Management Expense
Decide importance.

Decide
Decide priorities.

Promotion Expense
Accept promotion.

Gross Income (Loss)
Accept share of benefits.

Accept
Accept the benefits.

Manufacturing Costs
Make product or do service.

Operating Expense
Resolve situations.

Conceive
Conceive resolution.

Engineering Expense
Create capability.

Net Income (Loss)
Create Opportunity.

Create
Create opportunity.


Opportunity. What is appreciated as an opportunity? Pursuit of nothing but selfish satisfaction may meet with success. Committing to opportunity that correlates with general good is difficult to measure compared to simple financial opportunity, but ultimately far more rewarding. Considering the context that karma is real makes commitment a very serious proposition.

Individual caus

Universal effect

Opportunistic Behavior

Opportunity
Have opportunity.

Means
Use means.

Connect
Connect with means.

Spirit
Identify benefits.

Methods
Choose methods.

Choose
Choose beneficial methods.

Objective
Determine objective.

Goals
Find goals.

Discover
Discover working objectives.

Resources
Perceive resources.

Performance
Perceive performance.

Perceive
Perceive resourceful performance.

Tasks
Define tasks.

Purpose
Define purpose.

Define
Define purposeful tasks.

Requirements
Decide requirements.

Priority
Decide priorities.

Decide
Decide importance.

Relationships
Accept relationships.

Appreciate
Accept appreciation.

Accept
Accept share.

Strategy
Conceive strategy.

Operate
Conceive operation.

Conceive
Conceive resolution.

Organize
Create organization.

Succeed
Create Goods.

Create
Create success.


Solution. Problem-solving behavior improves the possibility of resolution. Denial rejects that possibility. What has been denied? What insight has been rejected? If the purpose is to keep dearly held concepts, then problem-solving is devoted to lack of resolution. Denial is personally, professionally, and spiritually unproductive. Seek to resolve real concerns.

Individual cause

Universal effect

Problem-solving Behavior

What is the concern?

Act.

Connect
Connect with action.

What benefit is desired?

Arrange benefits.

Choose
Choose the benefits.

What is the objective?

Qualify the objective.

Discover
Discover qualifications.

What means are available?

Perceive position.

Perceive
Perceive the means.

What methods are available?

Define method.

Define
Define available methods.

What is wanted? Not wanted?

Manage for the objective.

Decide
Decide the objective.

Accept means.

Commit means.

Accept
Accept the means.

Conceive method.

Resolve situations.

Conceive
Conceive resolution.

Organize.

Reveal the Insight.

Create
Create insight.


Revelation. God's perfect endowment is a revelation. Upon a revelation, love relieves concerns, forgiveness heals, judgment is unnecessary, denial and prejudice are no longer needed, and truth is perceived. The revelation may only validate one small insight, but small revelations promise large rewards, eventually. Seeing one truth has the potential of seeing all truth. But, since free will permits the choice of error, in real life the Labyrinth may be traversed many times.

Individual cause

Universal effect

Revealing Behavior

Miracle*
The truth of love and trust.

Tolerance
Break free of concerns.

Connect
Connect with love.

Atonement
Healing through forgiveness.

Gentleness
Judge gently.

Choose
Choose forgiveness.

Period of undoing
Value modification.

Joy
The purpose of salvation.

Discover
Discover salvation.

Period of sorting out
What is helpful?

Defenselessness
The truth sets one free.

Perceive
Perceive truth.

Period of relinquishment
Define truth.

Generosity
Give the peace of God.

Define
Define peace.

Period of settling down
Decide: give up and keep.

Patience
One who trusts can wait.

Decide
Decide to trust God.

Period of unsettling
What is really wanted.

Faith
Trust in the Word of God.

Accept
Accept the Word of God.

Period of achievement
Consolidate learning.

Open-mindedness
Let go and forgive.

Conceive
Conceive freedom.

Honesty
Consistency without deception.

Revelation
God's Perfect Endowment.

Create
Create perfection.